Needs for the content associated with the medical work regarding the pupil. The part associated with the manager

Needs for the content associated with the medical work regarding the pupil. The part associated with the manager

The requirements for assessing pupil research

1. The therapy regarding the research. It is necessary that even though making use of the systemic and integration approaches, it ought to be a work with therapy, without an evident bias in general management, advertising, pedagogy, legislation, philology, etc.

2. The degree of relevance and practical need for the investigation problems.

3. The standard of elaboration of theoretical material: overview of the literary works, comprehensively showing the developments of domestic and international boffins about this topic. Not merely the literature referencing is welcomed, but in addition analysis, contrast and benchmarking the various views of researchers, based on which the student formulates the writer’s place.

4. The connection between theoretical and material that is empirical. Relevance of the study susceptible to its content.

5. collection of diagnostic tools and research sample.

6. The amount of research outcomes.

7. The amount of interpretation of research outcomes (level of analysis).

8. The degree of guidelines written by the pupil audience.

9. Quality of work’s design.

10. The degree of research’s independence. The analysis ought to be conducted by the pupil separately, using the participation of other people just as topics or experts. Duplication and copying of studies carried out by other writers (plagiarism) is strictly prohibited. The clear presence of aspects of Independent creativity that is scientific the formula and reason of their particular way of solving the debatable problems associated with concept and training of therapy, the separate nature of this presentation regarding the product together with formula of conclusions in line with the link between the research are valued.

11. imaginative approach. You can find subjects which are examined in numerous combinations by pupils from year to 12 months – they may not be valued. An interesting subject is valued, the choice of innovative practices, writer’s practices and just about every other manifestation of imagination.

Work could be considered unsatisfactory by the after criteria.

1. scientific studies are perhaps perhaps perhaps not mental.

2. The research subject will not match its content.

3. The study wasn’t carried out or partially carried out. Its email address details are maybe perhaps maybe not prepared or partially processed. Its answers are prepared, however interpreted, or partially interpreted. The theoretical part will not match the empirical.

4. The text regarding the work will not meet with the needs associated with design tradition: there is a large number of spelling errors, the written text will not be modified, sloppy created.

5. The research is the full or partial plagiarism. In the event that term paper is thought to be unsatisfactory, it’s gone back towards the pupil for modification.

In the event that pupil failed to pass the initial protection or the commission discovered the job unsatisfactory, the pupil is certainly not permitted to protect and it is expelled through the college..

Duties regarding the manager of term and last qualifying work

Prior to the theme associated with the term paper or FQW (last qualifying work) manager:

– provides the student a job to get ready for a term paper or perhaps a thesis, assists the pupil when you look at the growth of a calendar working arrangements for your amount of the FQW;

– suggests to your pupil the required basic literary works as well as other sources from the theme;

– recommends the pupil in the selection of diagnostic tools and drawing up an arrange for empirical research

– recommends the pupil in the company regarding the study

– advises the pupil in the processing and interpretation of empirical customwritings.com review research results

– checks the job in components so that as an entire.

– For FQW writes review to get results and recommends the reviewer. The reviewer is planning overview of the job.

Dates and time of consultations are appointed because of the manager or the mind of this division. Attention! In the event that student failed to meet with the due dates set apart because of the dean’s workplace for term paper or FQW, the manager has got the right to not provide good advice.